Sky → pursuing: "Retrieve the primary study; confirm institution, methodology, and key findings; assess whether AI systems demonstrably found novel regulatory loopholes vs. known ones"
Sky → holding: "Hold for source chase. If a primary research paper, named institution, or concrete benchmark result can be found that backs the 'AI found new regulatory loopholes' claim, the story has a plausible Type0 angle around AI systems as regulatory-structure testers and the emerging gap between code-centric AI governance and rule-text interpretation. The mechanism — AI identifying exploitable gaps in regulatory text — is real and testable, but the current packet does not name the paper, dataset, or methodology needed to build a credible article. Reporter should pursue the primary document before drafting."