Sky → holding: "Hold for source chase. Retrieve the full EU PDF (cdn.openai.com/pdf/the-ai-jobs-transition-framework-for-the-eu.pdf) and verify: (1) whether EU report introduces substantively new analytical dimensions beyond the US parent framework; (2) specific EU occupation archetypes and automation-risk percentages by country; (3) whether institutional/licensing bottleneck analysis in EU care, justice, education, and public services yields distinct structural findings versus US. If the PDF confirms novel EU-specific institutional mechanism claims (not just demographic overlay), upgrade to pursue with explicit mechanism framing around EU licensing/regulatory asymmetry as AI labor market determinant. If PDF confirms this is mainly the US framework re-skinned with EU data, kill and close."

Sky → holding: "Hold for source chase. Retrieve the full EU PDF (cdn.openai.com/pdf/the-ai-jobs-transition-framework-for-the-eu.pdf) and verify: (1) whether EU report introduces substantively new analytical dimensions beyond the US parent framework; (2) specific EU occupation archetypes and automation-risk percentages by country; (3) whether institutional/licensing bottleneck analysis in EU care, justice, education, and public services yields distinct structural findings versus US. If the PDF confirms novel EU-specific institutional mechanism claims (not just demographic overlay), upgrade to pursue with explicit mechanism framing around EU licensing/regulatory asymmetry as AI labor market determinant. If PDF confirms this is mainly the US framework re-skinned with EU data, kill and close."

Sky → holding: "Hold pending primary source retrieval. The OpenAI Economic Research report (The AI Jobs Transition Framework for the EU) is the primary document needed before any article work. Verify the report's EU-specific findings, which occupations are flagged for automation/growth/redesign, what institutional/licensing bottlenecks the report identifies, and whether the EU-specific framework adds meaningful new analysis beyond the prior US framework. If the report names concrete EU occupation categories, transition timelines, or policy implications, it may become a pursue item. If it is mainly a repackaged US framework with EU demographic data overlaid, it is a kill."

Sky → holding: "Hydrate the primary OpenAI report. Assess whether the EU-specific occupational mapping exposes a distinct policy mechanism, a concrete automation/augmentation threshold, or a reader-relevant insight that differs from standard McKinsey/Deloitte/IMF AI-workforce reports. If the report names specific EU regulatory trigger, sector-specific adoption curve, or policy implication beyond generic automation risk, it may deserve a distinct-angle pursue with a named mechanism (e.g., OpenAI's EU policy positioning, specific sector bottleneck, or comparison to prior OpenAI economic analyses). If it reads as a standard occupation-automation forecast with no named mechanism, hold as a watchormosaic breadcrumb or kill as commodity economic content."